Sharing a noble failure
Okay, I’ve put about five hours into this but I don’t think it’s going to work.
Krystal at Hunter Performing Arts bravely created the initial grid (and probably put in five hours herself as well) and I’ve been attempting the Stage 4 and Stage 5 extension of it.
Here’s the problem: I don’t think it’s doing what people will want it to do. Have a look for yourself and you’ll see what I mean. HSPA K 10 Literacy Scope Draft
There’s interesting things to be gained from the experience, though:
- The Literacy Continuum doesn’t have enough detail for what we want with a scope and sequence
- The integrated language outcomes and content in the syllabus make deconstructing it for a scope extremely complex!
- If you start a project like this you need to perhaps stop and think about its purpose
- This purpose needs to be more specific than, ‘summarise the kind of language that we’ll use when we talk about literacy, grammar and language features.’
There’s useful things here, too, but there needs to be a better pathway to using them. I know some teachers are working similar projects as a wiki, I’m thinking that I’d love to get a staff working together, cutting things up and sticking them on a wall… Perhaps a grid system would work better? Something like this?
|Stage:||Whole text written/ spoken/ visual/ multimodal||Paragraphs/ Sections||Sentences/ Images||Word/ Elements|
I’ve got a couple of other projects on at the moment but I’d like to get back to this later in the term – so let me know if you’ve had more success than I have! In the meantime, why not pick what I’ve done apart? What needs work? What would work for you?
I’ll see (some of you) at ETA conference!